Pages

Showing posts with label Tax. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tax. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 20, 2026

Ireland's The Business Post Reports that Coca-Cola Transferred 4.4 Billion Euros from Ireland to the Cayman Islands to 'Pay Dividends,' with Less U.S. Taxes Paid

The Business Post has reported new details on Coca-Cola's evasive tax strategy paying €4.4 billion in dividends to a Cayman Islands entity, already scrutinized by U.S. Tax Court, which indicated that Coca-Cola owes around $6 billion in back taxes and interest. 

Coca-Cola
Money Sent to Cayman Islands

The IRS is Investigating Coca-Cola's Offshore Tax Strategy

The Business Post reported that a significant amount dividends was paid to an entity in the Cayman Islands, and these dividends were paid from its Irish office - an office being scrutinized by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). According to the article, the IRS is "probing whether Coca-Cola had moved profits from its U.S. tax base and allocated it to its Irish Operation, which then paid the money to the Cayman Islands, an offshore entity.

Yahoo! Finance reported that U.S. Tax Court found that Coca-Cola has hidden "astronomical levels" of profits in low-tax jurisdictions - one of which being Ireland - and that Coca-Cola owes the IRS about $6 billion USD. The other subsidiary named was it's Brazil subsidiary, which together could result in a combined $16 billion owed to the U.S.

Yahoo! Finance reported:

"The Irish subsidiary's tax rate tells a striking story. Back in 2017, the company paid a mere 1.32% on what it earned from operations. That rate rose to 7.88% by 2023 but fell again to 5.87% last year after the company claimed over 239 million euros ($280 million) in tax relief." -Leslie Sattler of Yahoo! Finance


Per the Business Post article, this is not the first time Coca-Cola's Irish subsidiary has been involved in a tax dispute with the U.S. 

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has been disputing Coca-Cola’s transfer pricing arrangements involving its Irish operation going back at least to the mid-2010s, with formal litigation and major rulings tied to profit allocations for tax years as early as 2007–2009. The IRS designated the case for litigation in 2015, kick-starting a long-running dispute over whether profits were artificially shifted offshore to subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions, including Ireland.

Reported by The Irish Times:

A U.S. Tax Court judgment from 2020 highlighted that Coca-Cola had manipulated profit allocations to its Irish unit—among others—leading to an extremely low effective tax rate and prompting orders for billions in back taxes and interest. This has been part of a long-running tax fight covering roughly a decade and continuing into appeals and related scrutiny. 

CFO: "The Company is Confident"

Chief Financial Officer John Murphy said the company is confident.

"We have outside counsel who have, each quarter, continued to evaluate the case on the facts that are available to them, and they continue to offer an opinion that gives us a greater-than-not chance of prevailing," he said.

Should Companies Like Coca-Cola Pay a Flat 15% Global Minimum Tax Rate?

To make things fair across the board, some believe that a global minimum tax rate should be instituted for all international companies. That way, large corporations could not have an option to evade taxes by moving revenues to overseas operations or offshore entities.

Yahoo! Finance also reported:

"What's being done about corporate tax avoidance?

More than 140 countries have agreed to a 15% global minimum corporate tax through the OECD, an effort meant to close loopholes that let companies shift profits to havens.

Meanwhile, the U.S. continues pursuing its case against Coca-Cola, with the company fighting the ruling on appeal."

Friday, February 07, 2014

H&R Block Online Software Dependent Glitch for Alabama Income Tax Filers

H&R Block Tax Software glitch for AL tax return filers

Alabama Income Tax Filers: If you use H&R Block online software to file your taxes, be aware - there is a glitch in the software when it carries your federal information over to the state tab. Your state tax return will not be accurate if this glitch is present.

I Found a 'Dependent Glitch' in the H&R Block Online Tax Software


I noticed that the information for my dependent was missing after I printed my Alabama tax return. For some reason it did not import the dependent data from the Federal tab to the state tab. I tried everything possible to add this data, but there was no ability to add a dependent on the state tab (see screenshot below).

tax software
Screenshot of AL dependent page of online tax software


After I Discovered the Glitch, I Called H&R Block Customer Support


I called H&R Block customer support. The lady on the phone couldn't figure it out either. She then had me go to the live chat support from the website. He couldn't figure it out, either. Then this guy transferred me over to technical support. He spent at least an hour researching why my dependent information did not carry over to the state return. He came up with a guess why the glitch happened, but it his guess not correct. He thought it didn't carry over because of Alabama's Tax law, but that was not the case.

In the time it took for him to research the problem, I manually did my Alabama tax return using the AL40 with calculations, available on the state website.

Resolution to H&R Block Online Tax Software 'Dependent Glitch'


What I ended up doing was getting a refund of ($36.99) for my AL state portion of the H&R Block online software, and I manually did my AL state return. The technical support guy said what you seem to hear a lot when there is a problem: "I've never seen that glitch happen before. So I am going to give you a refund on your state return."

It did happen, and is a good reason why you should always review your tax information before sending it in, even if you feel confident in the tax software. Tax software can have glitches in it.

I am glad that H&R Block was willing to give me a refund, after all, I am not going to pay for them to give me the wrong data on my individual income tax return.

This was a valuable lesson for me in using tax software, and how I am going to be extra careful in examining my returns in the future when filing my taxes.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Avoid Penalties with the IRS Tax Extension Deadline

Liberty Tax building
Liberty Income Tax


Now that the April 15th tax deadline is over, we can all relax again.

April 15, 2013 was the deadline to file individual tax returns to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This includes Form 1040, 1040A, & 1040EZ.

If you live in the U.S. and did not file by April 15, 2013, then hopefully you filed a six month extension – which can be done with Form 4868. Even if you file an extension, you still have to file your payment by April 15, 2013, or risk paying the late filing penalty. Now if the IRS owes you, you could be entitled to some interest on your money.

With a six-month extension, the last day to file individual tax returns to the IRS is: October 15, 2013.

Due to the Boston Marathon Bombing, residents of Suffolk County, MA are granted an automatic 3-month extension along with anyone who was in Boston area on April 15th. More information on this can be read here.

What is the Late Filing Penalty?


The IRS calculates the late filing penalty and charges interest based on the amount owed. If the IRS owes you money, there is no late filing penalty, and they may even pay you interest on your refund money.

If you are concerned about a late filing penalty, visit About.com’s IRS Tax Penalties article, which explains how the following are calculated: Failure to File Penalty, Failure to Pay Penalty, and Interest.

I know many tax professionals that file extensions for themselves. They are sure to mail a check in to the IRS by April 15, 2013, because they know they owe money. They write a check over the amount that they think they owe, since they have not actually computed the actual amount owed yet. This is done to avoid paying a penalty or interest for any money owed to the IRS.

Then, when they file their own tax returns, they simply account for the tax payment, and they get the difference back from the IRS.

That's how the pros do it.

How did you do it?

Image source: MorgueFile; (no attribution required)